Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory35.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 02:38
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 713
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1647 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 113
Parallax 174
92% 133 fps
MRender 92.6
Gravity 123
Splatting 78.1
78% 97.9 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 251 188 172 174 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,881
Write 530
Mixed 590
SusWrite 222
175% 806 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 18.9
91% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 20.2
99% 246 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 214%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
60GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 442 420 390 390 394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 428
Write 149
Mixed 321
SusWrite 411
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 35.3
122% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 95%
Kingdian S280 120GB
70GB free
Firmware: R1008A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 144 145 145 145 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 383
Mixed 402
SusWrite 174
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 48.7
161% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 120
113% 175 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
12GB free
Firmware: SBFZ10.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 405
Mixed 359
93% 420 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 34
134% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 158
125% 172 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 89%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
9GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,035
Write 2252
Mixed 1,818
455% 2,035 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 68.1
230% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 881
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 773
588% 795 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GIS Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GIS 40GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 4096, 16384, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 35.7
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 35.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $838
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback