Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory36.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 08:43
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 857
86% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.9% Very good
Lighting 96.3
Reflection 102
Parallax 149
78% 116 fps
MRender 89.8
Gravity 109
Splatting 77.4
74% 91.9 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 246 190 197 185 186 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,888
Write 587
Mixed 546
SusWrite 228
177% 812 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 20.1
102% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 29.5
104% 250 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 135%
Great: 214%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
60GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 448 210 152 150 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 468
Write 447
Mixed 394
SusWrite 260
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 38.1
135% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 95%
Kingdian S280 120GB
70GB free
Firmware: R1008A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 144 144 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 316
Mixed 402
SusWrite 174
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 54
180% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 119
112% 174 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 109%
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
12GB free
Firmware: SBFZ10.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 501
Write 413
Mixed 373
95% 429 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 37.3
146% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 160
126% 173 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 89%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
35GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,034
Write 2,320
Mixed 1,844
462% 2,066 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 77.3
274% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,350
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 1,114
836% 1,124 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GIS Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GIS 40GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 4096, 16384, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 33
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 33.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $838
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback