ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 81T3

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Lenovo 81T3 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201130
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '22 at 21:17
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 71.7 2-Core 142 60% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 382 39% 315 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Legend(17AA 3FFB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.30 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	45.5% Average	Lighting 59.1 Reflection 65 Parallax 53.2 48% 59.1 fps	MRender 42.4 Gravity 52.7 Splatting 51 40% 48.7 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L3A0B 256GB 4,440 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80030C10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 345 294 253 223 202 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 695 Write 870 Mixed 417 SusWrite 297 128% 570 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 36.3 143% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 523 DQ Write 407 DQ Mixed 445 338% 458 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 172%
Inateck FE202x Series 500GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 312GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 323 341 350 332 323 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 151 Write 291 Mixed 184 SusWrite 307 53% 233 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 28.3 90% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 129 91% 113 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 84%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 928GB free Firmware: JU0A0E SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 135 135 140 140 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 136 Write 86 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 137 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 198% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FD 1x8GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	41.1% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 81T3 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Lenovo 81T3

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	146x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	136x
Core i5-9300HFIntelBench 73%, 6,965 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	300x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	20x

SSD
HFM512GDHTNG-8310A 512GBBench 122%, 3,390 samples	57x
MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 198%, 9,460 samples	40x
MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBMicronBench 165%, 3,817 samples	32x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	71x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples	30x
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 2x8GBRamaxelBench 76%, 8,736 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback