Acer TravelMate 8371

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate 8371  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate 8371
Memory0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100811
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 07 '17 at 16:28
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel U7300
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 53.8
1-Core 16.7
2-Core 25.9
25% 32.1 Pts
4-Core 32.6
8-Core 23.7
4% 28.1 Pts
64-Core 19.1
1% 19.1 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0283)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.25% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.25 fps
MRender 0.24
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.22
0% 0.26 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.25%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$28
61GB free
Firmware: SD25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 68.7
Mixed 67.7
51% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.24
59% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 58%
Kingdian H100 32GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20151106 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
Read 118
Write 49
Mixed 45.9
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.42
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.9
390% 2.84 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 48%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB
30GB free, PID 0159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 16.5
Mixed 16.3
21% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.38
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 1.43
135% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD73I1A0873EU 0198 99U5428-015.A00G 3GB
800, 800 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 1.7
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 1.3
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback