Asus TP203NAH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TP203NAH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP203NAH
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 13:10
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 43.2
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 76.9
32% 53.2 Pts
4-Core 74.8
8-Core 78
10% 76.4 Pts
64-Core 76.9
5% 76.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Asus(1043 1930) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 331 333 348 310 332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 282
Write 349
Mixed 329
SusWrite 317
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 38.7
120% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 133
99% 132 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 137%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
4GB free, PID 7113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.4 6.3 6.5 6.4 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Read 3.3
Write 6
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6.3
8% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 9%
SDHC Card 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 19 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
8.88% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 5.8
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 18.9
17% 14 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.9
50% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.88%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP203NAH Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP203NAH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback