Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211013
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '22 at 12:44
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	GEO-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Memory 89.5 1-Core 145 2-Core 298 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 1,002 93% 776 Pts	64-Core 1494 92% 1494 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 40.7 Reflection 39.3 Parallax 52.4 33% 44.1 fps	MRender 55 Gravity 49.6 Splatting 39.5 38% 48 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 137 126 134 112 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 491 Mixed 311 SusWrite 157 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 54.1 193% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 176 186% 306 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 202 201 200 197 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 166 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 198 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 114%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: SN03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 149 149 149 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 181 Mixed 101 SusWrite 147 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 238% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 105%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 3,232 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: SDM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 133 133 131 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 125 Write 97.3 Mixed 81 SusWrite 131 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 70%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power64G 64GB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 30GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 35 41 32 38 43 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 49.2 Write 23.8 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 38.6 37% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.4 91% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 29%
Kingston DataTraveler 70 64GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 23GB free, PID 172b Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 9 7.2 6.4 8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 110 Write 4.2 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 7.7 24% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Mixed 0 61% 5.45 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 37%
Kingston Reader MicSD/M2 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	8.94% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 12 Mixed 16 SusWrite 15.6 20% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 77% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.94% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 32,191 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 40.9 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 28.7 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 41.7 93% 32.4 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	88x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	81x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	61x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	45x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $32Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,006

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)