Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '22 at 09:12
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5200 APU 10,450 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Memory 41.1 1-Core 30.8 2-Core 61.4 28% 44.4 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 122 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FA85) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.1 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 2.8 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.2 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 101 52 52 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 414 Write 341 Mixed 172 SusWrite 88.8 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 2.3 45% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 71.7 DQ Write 34.3 DQ Mixed 34.5 30% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 60%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 20GB free, PID 0745 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 18 19 20 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 30.2 Write 20.1 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 19.3 29% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 4.1 291% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 25%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 2,761 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 21GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 14 14 15 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 20.8 Mixed 14.4 SusWrite 15.6 26% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.4 135% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 249 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C70D-A Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-A

CPU
E1-2100 APUAMDBench 17%, 4,569 samples	15x
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	13x
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	5x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	15x
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	13x
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
CS900 120GBPNY $15Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	10x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	2x
M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 45%, 249 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16