Ciara H110MAD-XA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCiara H110MAD-XA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-A/DP
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 14:30
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 661
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
XFX(1682 2962) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 25.4
23% 24.9 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 11.5
12% 15.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$93
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 306 303 295 292 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 421
Mixed 330
SusWrite 316
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 36.1
140% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 247
203% 292 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL15-15-15 D4-2133 Hynix 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 12.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110MAD-XA Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Ciara H110MAD-XA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback