Ciara H110MAD-XA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCiara H110MAD-XA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-A/DP
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 14:20
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 680
73% 583 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
XFX(1682 2962) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 24.9
23% 24.4 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 11.2
12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$94
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 305 295 292 291 292 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 421
Mixed 300
SusWrite 299
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 43.3
160% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 236
198% 287 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL15-15-15 D4-2133 Hynix 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.9% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 20.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110MAD-XA Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Ciara H110MAD-XA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback