Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 12:06
Run Duration343 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 177
2-Core 353
108% 204 Pts
4-Core 697
8-Core 1,104
111% 901 Pts
64-Core 1,619
100% 1,619 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 116
Parallax 105
89% 110 fps
MRender 98.8
Gravity 104
Splatting 102
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,945
Write 2,161
Mixed 1,634
428% 1,913 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 69.5
244% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1254
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 1025
773% 1,046 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
82GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 267 270 264 265 263 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 433
Write 271
Mixed 300
SusWrite 266
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 34.2
125% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 141
121% 179 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 91%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
68GB free
Firmware: 00.0NA00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 76 77 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 73.5
Write 74.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 76.2
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
17GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 92 81 64 78 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 74.5
Write 93
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 79.9
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 90%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
83GB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 78 89 85 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 67.8
Write 67.7
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 82.8
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 61%
ASMT 2105 1TB
85GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 65 65 66 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 64.3
Write 49
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 64
73% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 82%
ASMT 2115 1TB
432GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 92
Write 101
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 84.1
112% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 34.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 35.9
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback