Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora Ryzen Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0NWN7M
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 22:42
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 963
93% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,467
91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.84
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 143
Reflection 142
Parallax 143
116% 143 fps
Gravity 142
Splatting 142
126% 142 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g NVM 512GB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1742 792 798 800 809 808 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Tcsunbow X3 1TB
274GB free
Firmware: S033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 423 133 11 12 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 457
Write 401
Mixed 363
SusWrite 170
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 18
71% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 53.1
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 10.9
57% 122 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX3200C16D4/8GX 01980000802C XJ69DF-MIE2 0198000080AD KHX3200C16D4/8GX 01980000802C XJ69DF-MIE2 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 33
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 34
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Ryzen Edition Builds (Compare 880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $999
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback