Gigabyte GA-EP45T-USB3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP45T-USB3P  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 16:17
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 96.5
48% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 196
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.7% Average
Lighting 53.4
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 56.9
44% 58.1 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 59
Splatting 50.3
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 199 200 145 123 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 249
Write 220
Mixed 138
SusWrite 154
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 21.3
88% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 52.2
68% 123 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53%
Great: 85%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
699GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 105 106 104 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 104
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP45T-USB3P Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45T-USB3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $556
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback