Asus CM6870

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus CM6870 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6870
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '21 at 15:08
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$59 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 177 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 332 46% 340 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 8094) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.7 1% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 369 Write 336 Mixed 218 68% 308 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 30.8 108% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 41.3 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 49.8 45% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 749GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 101 98 102 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 103 Write 101 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 101 65% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 863GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 124 120 124 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 122 Write 110 Mixed 59.1 SusWrite 123 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 30 29 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 29.3 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 29.3 21% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 220% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC 2x4GB 1,334 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.6% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 18.9 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	508x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	47x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	22x

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	59x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	57x
EL64C1C1624Z1 4x4GBAdataBench 56%, 506 samples	47x
SLA302G08-GGNNG 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 364 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16