| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Supermicro X9DRG-QF (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRG-QF |
| Memory | 119.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131205 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 31 '21 at 09:57 |
| Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
| Run User | HKG-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
63%
Good
|
56% 95.4 Pts
|
52% 443 Pts
|
149% 2,401 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
Nvidia(10DE 1066) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49%
Average
|
46% 67.1 fps
|
55% 68.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
581GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 426 416 424 422 422 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
96% 426 MB/s
|
137% 45.8 MB/s
|
236% 317 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
349GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 93 91 93 MB/s
|
62.3%
Good
|
74% 99.7 MB/s
|
161% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
117%
Outstanding
|
140% 48.9 GB/s
|
22% 7.8 GB/s
|
42% 94.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9DRG-QF Builds (Compare 13 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9DRG-QF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v21stBench 63%, 551 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 2x |
| GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $130 |