Lenovo 81N6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81N6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 07:35
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 210
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 408
48% 374 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.28.15
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 19.1
11% 15.2 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 13.1
11% 13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,275
Write 2,063
Mixed 1,476
431% 1,938 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 69.8
225% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 672
493% 654 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 264%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 256GB
181GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.4% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 33.3
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 17.5
7% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 11.7
40% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 23.2
DQ Mixed 24.7
19% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 70%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 1TB
633GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 32.4
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 17.5
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 20.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81N6 Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81N6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback