Asrock B85M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B85M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160105
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 17:28
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 97
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 346
48% 354 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 111
Parallax 169
90% 130 fps
MRender 92.5
Gravity 125
Splatting 76.4
78% 97.8 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 148 65 37 57 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.3% Above average
Read 250
Write 230
Mixed 230
SusWrite 93.7
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 26.6
116% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 47.7
70% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 100%
WD WD6400AARS-00Y5B1 640GB
299GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 105 103 98 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 78.2
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 103
54% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
142GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 6.7
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 65.2
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown E30143A 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.7
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-DGS Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B85M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback