QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '21 at 11:53
Run Duration	339 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core 74 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 59.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 201 70% 127 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 807 70% 595 Pts	64-Core 831 51% 831 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 131 Reflection 135 Parallax 131 107% 132 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 134 Splatting 116 99% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 816GB free Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2714 2720 2688 2521 2025 1617 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	332% Outstanding	Read 2,345 Write 2,594 Mixed 2696 SusWrite 2,381 566% 2,504 MB/s	4K Read 53.2 4K Write 97 4K Mixed 68.2 219% 72.8 MB/s	DQ Read 620 DQ Write 448 DQ Mixed 528 396% 532 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 332% Great: 488%
Red Hat VirtIO 376GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 144GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,462 Write 2,205 Mixed 1,963 492% 2,210 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 39.2 133% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 137 109% 151 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 82%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,565 Write 2,248 Mixed 2,568 1,860% 2,461 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 42.4 7,418% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 125 1,368% 175 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 45.4 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 48.9 124% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 26.4 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	141x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16