QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	99.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '21 at 17:35
Run Duration	467 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core 74 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 147 53% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 544 50% 417 Pts	64-Core 1,101 68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.1% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 132 Parallax 122 102% 126 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 128 Splatting 108 94% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 896GB free Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1804 1822 1716 1728 1859 1813 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 1,664 Write 1,862 Mixed 1,766 SusWrite 1,791 400% 1,771 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 38.5 128% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 295 219% 293 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 488%
Red Hat VirtIO 376GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 144GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 41 63 49 42 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 82%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,523 Write 1,349 Mixed 1455 1,088% 1,443 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 18.4 3,176% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 89.9 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 72.3 857% 116 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 44.9 MC Write 46.1 MC Mixed 48.3 133% 46.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 23.1 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16