Lenovo 90AV002AMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90AV002AMT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 16:13
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 161
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 359
43% 330 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Device(1642 3E32) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 20.5
17% 19.7 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.5
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF120HCHP-000L1 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 14 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 437
Write 17.1
Mixed 44
SusWrite 15.4
27% 128 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 9.6
54% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 18.3
35% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
234GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 138 143 141 140 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 148
Mixed 110
SusWrite 139
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.3
238% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 109%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
707GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 124
Write 40.1
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 119
104% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AV002AMT Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90AV002AMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback