| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3118-A1 |
| Memory | 60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120906 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 29 '21 at 10:25 |
| Run Duration | 215 Seconds |
| Run User | MKD-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
60%
Good
|
60% 112 Pts
|
61% 507 Pts
|
104% 1,683 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.1%
Poor
|
29% 37.3 fps
|
27% 33.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 46 129 45 71 63 MB/s
|
41.2%
Average
|
38% 171 MB/s
|
71% 22 MB/s
|
79% 114 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
420GB free
Firmware: A840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 92 95 94 95 MB/s
|
53.7%
Above average
|
63% 85.9 MB/s
|
163% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
52.2%
Above average
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
27% 9.6 GB/s
|
27% 148 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R920 Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 9x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples | 5x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |