TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire TC-885

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-885  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-885
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 17:58
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 237
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 698
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 85.5%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Acer(1025 1238) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.3 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.9%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 690 676 638 640 643 660 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,427
Write 2,074
Mixed 1,813
SusWrite 658
338% 1,493 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.5
191% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 997
755% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑
This bench: 203%
 Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
619GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 113
Write 81.4
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 126
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 68.7%
 Great: 114%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
371GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 65 66 67 66 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 49.5
Mixed 42
SusWrite 66.5
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 37.4%
 Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 8502 PSD48G240081 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 20.1
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 70.2%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire TC-885 Builds (Compare 1,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-885

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel  $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples764x
Core i5-9400Intel  $160Bench 86%, 22,187 samples511x
Core i3-9100Intel  $114Bench 80%, 7,621 samples164x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples522x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples165x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples160x
SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples290x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 169%, 2,949 samples44x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,156 samples42x
RAM
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 12GBKingstonBench 61%, 1,808 samples180x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples167x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 3,004 samples154x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback