Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive12.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-S2  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '17 at 00:56
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 98
51% 78 Pts
4-Core 96.1
8-Core 100
13% 98.2 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6790
PwrHis(1787 2310) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 13.2
12% 13.9 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 15
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 35862 4TB
471GB free
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.93% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 26.5
Mixed 31.1
6% 27 MB/s
4K Read 8.86
4K Write 8.04
4K Mixed 4.61
24% 7.17 MB/s
DQ Read 10.4
DQ Write 8.34
DQ Mixed 4.72
5% 7.84 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 17%
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 86GB
43GB free (System drive)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 75.8
Write 28.7
Mixed 42
11% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 8.11
4K Mixed 5.09
25% 7.43 MB/s
DQ Read 9.22
DQ Write 9.38
DQ Mixed 5.06
5% 7.88 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-S2 Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2 - $59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback