Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 09:59
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 109
53% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 141
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3555) 2GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.86% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 12.7
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 11.4
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 54GB
17GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 29 30 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 87
Write 44.4
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 31.9
12% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 14.9
52% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 19.6
14% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 25%
CGM Virtual Disk 35606 1TB
111GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.5 1.9 2.3 2 2.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 53.3
Write 29.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 2.2
7% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 8
25% 7.8 MB/s
DQ Read 6.2
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 8.3
7% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 19%
CGM Virtual Disk 35862 4TB
2TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.7 2 2.3 2.1 2.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.42% Terrible
Read 35.3
Write 36.8
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 2.2
6% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 7.7
23% 7.93 MB/s
DQ Read 6.1
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 8.9
8% 11.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 17%
CGM Virtual Disk 36118 1TB
14GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.6 1.9 2.3 2 2.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 54
Write 29.3
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 2.2
7% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 7.5
25% 7.67 MB/s
DQ Read 6.3
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 7.1
7% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 17%
Merelair 60G 60GB
5GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 30 29 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
Read 31.3
Write 29.8
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 29.4
41% 30 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 4.2
399% 5.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.9
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback