HP 700-567nz

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-567nz  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 13:48
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 169
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 523
52% 427 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1570 MHz, MLim: 1757 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 48.4
Parallax 43.2
39% 46.4 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 37.9
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
108GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 438 398 277 275 278 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 424
Mixed 410
SusWrite 353
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 43.1
153% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
CHN-mSATAM3-128 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0707A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 142 142 145 145 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
388GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 124 124 126 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 118
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 125
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C11 Adata 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C11 Adata 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-567nz Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP 700-567nz

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback