PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F |
Memory | 16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20180529 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Dec 28 '21 at 06:29 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 80% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
73.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 122 157 197 72 85 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
SSD 120GB
50GB free
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 117 202 127 70 83 MB/s
|
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 C8 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
96.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 7x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 5x |
Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon Pro WX 3100AMDBench 14%, 1,651 samples | 5x |
Quadro FX 3800NvidiaBench 6%, 3,739 samples | 3x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 3x |
SSD | |
---|---|
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 7x |
860 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 86%, 3,453 samples | 5x |
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $258 |