Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180529
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 06:29
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 183
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 420
45% 357 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 31.5
19% 27.3 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 21
19% 24.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 122 157 197 72 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.3% Below average
Read 198
Write 77.2
Mixed 101
SusWrite 146
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 15.9
70% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 29.5
DQ Mixed 26.7
21% 28.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 85%
SSD 120GB
50GB free
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 117 202 127 70 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 103
Write 69.7
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 138
21% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 9.5
43% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 C8 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 37.4
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $258
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback