Acer Aspire 5750G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire 5750G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE50_HR
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '21 at 13:21
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 148
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 354
39% 309 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0504) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.4
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.56%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk U110 128GB-$69
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U221000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 153 219 198 105 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 396
Write 278
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 178
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 7.4
28% 8.93 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 13.4
12% 19.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3S13C9G Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5750G Builds (Compare 743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5750G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback