Monster TULPAR T7 V9.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V9.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V9.2
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '21 at 14:36
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 663
62% 516 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7706) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 389.27
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 133
Parallax 123
101% 127 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 129
Splatting 111
96% 117 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 789 1143 1258 1348 1346 1345 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1737
Write 1325
Mixed 1,298
SusWrite 1,205
312% 1,391 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 79.8
256% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 1008
720% 916 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 262%
Great: 332%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
870GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 104
Write 20.2
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 16.1
31% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 27.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 27.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V9.2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V9.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback