Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180620
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '21 at 00:39
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 131 2-Core 244 88% 155 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 827 77% 641 Pts	64-Core 1,064 66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.9% Above average	Lighting 69.4 Reflection 74.1 Parallax 65.2 57% 69.6 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 65.5 54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 94 96 83 5.3 7 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 462 Write 358 Mixed 338 SusWrite 100 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 32.6 126% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 201 178% 266 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 254GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 105 105 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 153 Write 146 Mixed 97.4 SusWrite 104 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB 2,275 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 41 42 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 39.3 Write 38.2 Mixed 31.4 SusWrite 40.5 51% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 159% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 65%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 29GB free, PID 0023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5.9 5.7 5.1 5 5.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 3.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.1 9% 7.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 21.5 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 29 SC Mixed 22.6 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	195x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	183x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	129x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	79x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	62x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 121% - Outstanding

Total price: $244

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16