Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '17 at 09:10
Run Duration	326 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 98.3 2-Core 197 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 744 68% 567 Pts	64-Core 1,065 66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Lighting 47.9 Reflection 32 Parallax 32.7 39% 37.5 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 44.8 Splatting 39.2 33% 41 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1357 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 64 (64) Unknown 100 100 1390608 (65) Unknown 100 100 170400 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 24 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 819 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 646 (B7) Unknown 99 99 7 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 100 184685101093 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 98 98 2 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2517 (EA) Unknown 100 100 983 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1921 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2350 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	59.2% Above average	Read 470 Write 188 Mixed 215 64% 291 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 11.6 75% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 91.5 DQ Mixed 23.7 54% 117 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 322GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 21 (03) Spinup time 143 134 3825 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 101 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1353 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 98 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 45 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 20134 (C2) HDA temperature 107 101 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.8% Excellent	Read 138 Write 150 Mixed 138 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.24 112% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 87%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.33% Terrible	Read 32.3 Write 5.69 Mixed 6.96 14% 15 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.003 22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.33% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 2x8GB 3,148 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	98.8% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 34.7 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 38.4 SC Mixed 28.8 85% 29.7 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	329x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	196x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $32Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)