DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory13.9 GB free of 15 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 22:55
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 133
57% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 323
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 64.9
54% 67.7 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 56.7
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 247 293 296 232 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 329
Write 280
Mixed 304
SusWrite 250
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 27
86% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 228
166% 217 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 133%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
433GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 143 144 144 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 143
Write 110
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 143
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 110%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
32GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 78 79 79 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 76.9
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 78.4
59% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 75%
ASMT 2115 4TB
3TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 59 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 110
Mixed 111
SusWrite 59
138% 108 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 13.9
1,110% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 15.6
1,294% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 95%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
442GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 56 59 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 150
Write 99.4
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 57
123% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 15GB
null MHz
1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 13.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback