Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.3
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 16:49
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 858
85% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,125
70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1116) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9709
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 122
Parallax 123
98% 122 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 88.6
Splatting 80.4
80% 101 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 981 357 333 340 334 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,267
Write 1,286
Mixed 1114
SusWrite 590
239% 1,064 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 67.3
225% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 823
DQ Mixed 923
677% 885 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 195%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (84th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 24.1
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.3 Builds (Compare 599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback