Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.3
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 09:24
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 167
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 459
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1116) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6627
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 43.9
32% 57.3 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 48.6
21% 21.9 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 1076 175 350 358 353 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,116
Write 1078
Mixed 1,106
SusWrite 582
218% 971 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 45.2
168% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 635
468% 619 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 159%
Great: 206%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
12GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.7 4 3 4 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Read 3
Write 2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 3.6
4% 2.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.3 Builds (Compare 599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback