HP 295 G6 Microtower PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 295 G6 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 871E
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 09:41
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 250
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 736
76% 614 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 871E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 21.8
13% 16.9 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 18.9
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA8U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 125 31 35 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40% Average
Read 48.8
Write 107
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 90.7
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6DJR6N-XN 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 295 G6 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 295 G6 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback