HP ZBook 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook 17  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 190A
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 22:00
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 172
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 444
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3100M
HP(103C 190A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 16.1
10% 15 fps
MRender 17.7
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 14.4
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct2000mx CT2000MX50 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 329 346 368 302 372 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 236
Write 235
Mixed 325
SusWrite 340
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 39.8
121% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 48.3
37% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 17 Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback