Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '17 at 15:45
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 195
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 376
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 848A) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.6 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.3
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
629GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 69.1
Mixed 5.59
33% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.24
76% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
254GB free
Firmware: 3.AFE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 75.4
Write 72.7
Mixed 28.7
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D169DS3.16FE 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback