Siemens SIMATIC IPC847C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSiemens SIMATIC IPC847C  (all builds)
MotherboardSIEMENS A5E03383577
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131030
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 05:32
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 E 520
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 97.5
44% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 150
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 295
Nvidia(10DE 06FD) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.4
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 209 204 204 210 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.5% Above average
Read 218
Write 210
Mixed 205
SusWrite 209
48% 210 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 25
92% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 194
147% 197 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G6K1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SIMATIC IPC847C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Siemens SIMATIC IPC847C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback