Lenovo 20AWA15YLM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20AWA15YLM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AWA15YLM
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 04:53
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 156
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 216
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6
Parallax 7
3% 5.63 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NT-256 256GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0519A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 11 32 11 64 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 379
Write 322
Mixed 255
SusWrite 33.6
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 65.2
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
11% 28.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
182GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 114 115 120 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 60.2
Write 62.5
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 116
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
153% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20AWA15YLM Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20AWA15YLM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback