TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z77A-GD65 GAMING (MS-7751)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77A-GD65 GAMING (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '14 at 00:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 124
2-Core 243
84% 184 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 699
71% 577 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 59% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 0466) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.200.0.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 59
Parallax 78.9
53% 67.7 fps
MRender 54.8
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 75
53% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 53.3%
 Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDRAID 512GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.1% Outstanding
Read 813
Write 538
Mixed 525
138% 625 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 18.9
70% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 102
120% 218 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 99.1%
 Great: 89%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
278GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 91
Write 110
Mixed 95.1
74% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 3.11
4K Mixed 0.37
116% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 57.9%
 Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
118GB free
Firmware: MX6O
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 115
Write 75.2
Mixed 75.7
66% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.2
97% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 54.6%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z77A-GD65 GAMING (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD65 GAMING (MS-7751)

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel  $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples62x
Core i5-3570KIntel  $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples31x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples24x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples19x
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples13x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $256Bench 100%, 447,556 samples10x
SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 101%, 14,082 samples8x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples6x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples7x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples6x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback