Asus TUF GAMING B550-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 15:12
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 299
101% 181 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 985
100% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,172
79% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 70
Parallax 67.4
55% 68.5 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 67.2
56% 67.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 62%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,345
Write 1,063
Mixed 712
230% 1,040 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 10.9
58% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 31.8
DQ Mixed 64.1
77% 144 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 223%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$25
60GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 60 54 32 33 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 505
Write 425
Mixed 421
SusWrite 99.9
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 1.1
113% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 44.4
53% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
448GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 77
Write 14.4
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 78.7
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
112GB free
Firmware: 3.AFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 47.7
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 57.3
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 43%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$50
909GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 85 90 93 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 80.4
Write 70.7
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 88.4
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 144 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F10 BenQ XL2411T
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PRO Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $699
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback