Pcware IPMH110P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPcware IPMH110P  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMH110P
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 13:33
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
Socket 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 247
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 677
71% 569 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
EVGA(3842 1351) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.61% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 8.2
7% 9.83 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.8
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.61%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 204 236 277 208 306 MB/s
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.8% Good
Read 169
Write 96.2
Mixed 150
SusWrite 256
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 26.6
112% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 119
115% 182 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 100%
SSD 720GB 720GB
83GB free
Firmware: FW210415
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 133 16 25 24 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 495
Write 356
Mixed 348
SusWrite 103
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 12.6
133% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 20.2
74% 163 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 CL 17 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH110P Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware IPMH110P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback