Today's hottest deals

Pcware IPMH110P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPcware IPMH110P  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMH110P
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 12:39
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
Socket 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 678
73% 581 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
EVGA(3842 1351) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.55% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 8.2
7% 9.83 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.8
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.55%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 207 290 205 227 268 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 172
Write 95.5
Mixed 85
SusWrite 249
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 9.5
39% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 210
130% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 100%
SSD 720GB 720GB
83GB free
Firmware: FW210415
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 204 17 20 17 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 504
Write 370
Mixed 351
SusWrite 113
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 12.2
126% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 20.2
74% 161 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 CL 17 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 21.9
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 23.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH110P Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware IPMH110P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback