Asus WS Z390 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Asus WS Z390 PRO (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK WS Z390 PRO
Memory	18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '21 at 11:19
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 99.2 1-Core 153 2-Core 310 103% 188 Pts	4-Core 619 8-Core 1,220 109% 920 Pts	64-Core 1,707 106% 1,707 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Svbus Virtual Hard Disk SCSI RAM Device 13GB 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 8,753 Write 11,322 Mixed 9,879 2,244% 9,984 MB/s	4K Read 1,080 4K Write 992 4K Mixed 1,008 3,453% 1,027 MB/s	DQ Read 1,877 DQ Write 1,787 DQ Mixed 1,826 1,372% 1,830 MB/s

Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB 4,181 User benchmarks, average bench 260% 141GB free Firmware: S7780100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1031 745 741 738 739 738 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	326% Outstanding	Read 2,801 Write 2,093 Mixed 1,716 SusWrite 789 412% 1,850 MB/s	4K Read 66.5 4K Write 225 4K Mixed 98 345% 130 MB/s	DQ Read 1,312 DQ Write 1353 DQ Mixed 564 636% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 326% Great: 334%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB 11,560 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 275GB free Firmware: SBFA12.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 460 163 120 354 105 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 235 Write 103 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 275 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 10.9 55% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 14.1 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 14.8 11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 102%
Toshiba HDWD260 6TB 663 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2TB free Firmware: KQ000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 176 177 176 177 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB 9,340 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3902 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	MC Read 49.9 MC Write 51.9 MC Mixed 39.7 135% 47.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.6 SC Write 56.3 SC Mixed 39.7 118% 41.2 GB/s	Latency 39.8 101% 39.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WS Z390 PRO Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 153%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

System: Asus WS Z390 PRO

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	221x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	40x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $294Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	11x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	38x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples	23x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	28x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	20x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 95%, 8,117 samples	9x
HyperX 2666 C16 4x16GBKingstonBench 89%, 2,802 samples	8x
HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GBKingstonBench 107%, 1,108 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $942

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16