MSI MS-17C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE73 Raider RGB 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-17C5  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 04:00
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 584
63% 499 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1215) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 7.6
5% 29.2 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 1
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 276 97 91 90 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 518
Write 226
Mixed 266
SusWrite 148
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 24.8
95% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 297
231% 321 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 126%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
343GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 119 115 112 117 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 67.2
Write 70.8
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 114
49% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52%
Great: 110%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB
58GB free, PID dd3b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 22 23 26 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 102
Write 13.5
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 24
44% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
54% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.2
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 23
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17C5 Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback