HP p6769sc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP p6769sc  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '21 at 13:13
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 133
55% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 202
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 36.3
22% 30.4 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 25.3
22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
654GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 98 87 89 108 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 142
Write 130
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 96.4
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
191GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 94 92 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 94.1
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 92.5
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 9B852C80 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6769sc Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6769sc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback