Asus P5P41T-LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics92.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5P41T-LE  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5440
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 91.4
47% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 166
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Asus(1043 8797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 126
Parallax 108
95% 117 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 92.1
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 112 38 34 70 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.3% Below average
Read 219
Write 189
Mixed 106
SusWrite 79
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 13.4
52% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 23.1
DQ Mixed 20.8
16% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 55%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
2GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 222
Write 219
Mixed 70.5
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 29.2
99% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 33.8
31% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5P41T-LE Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5P41T-LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback