Asus P6T SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6T SE  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '21 at 19:03
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MNE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 113
54% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 339
32% 265 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 21.1
17% 20.3 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair CSSD-F160GBP2 180GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 62 64 71 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 99.7
Write 106
Mixed 110
SusWrite 69.9
22% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 17.6
76% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 27.6
28% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 16.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback