Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191014
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '21 at 17:46
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 51.1 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 69% 132 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 478 62% 468 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2158 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 53.8 Parallax 42.1 33% 45.4 fps	MRender 46.7 Gravity 42 Splatting 30.2 31% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 120 69 96 53 49 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 427 Write 369 Mixed 300 SusWrite 92.3 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 13.2 57% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 72.1 DQ Mixed 31.6 40% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 55%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,582 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 483GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 111 Mixed 19.1 52% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 52%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB 1,821 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 258GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 77 77 75 74 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 75.9 Write 56.8 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 73 85% 64 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FP 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 28.4 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 24.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,082 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,467x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,008x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	952x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	736x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	654x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	717x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	285x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	227x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16