Clevo W870CU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemClevo W870CU  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W870CU
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 19:42
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 131
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 240
28% 219 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Clevo(1558 8687) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.01% Terrible
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 11.9
10% 11.8 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.01%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 45 18 56 122 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 230
Write 208
Mixed 203
SusWrite 89.5
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 11.8
40% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 42.6
45% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.1% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W870CU Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W870CU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback