Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z10PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PA-D8 Series
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 170
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 667
59% 500 Pts
64-Core 3,476
215% 3,476 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 53.1
49% 57.8 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 53.4
46% 57 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 1878 1488 1497 1492 1482 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1902
Write 1,922
Mixed 1,364
SusWrite 1,629
384% 1,704 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 64.6
207% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 547
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 517
376% 492 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 262%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G3B1 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback