bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 10:29
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 176
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 454
45% 368 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6970
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 27.2
21% 27.8 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 19.5
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 306 313 313 314 315 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 471
Mixed 403
SusWrite 324
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 41.3
128% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 358
271% 365 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96%
Great: 124%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 228 233 231 231 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 208
Mixed 63
SusWrite 229
128% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.4
267% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 125%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B485831363030433944332F344758202020 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback